10 learnings from digital leaders in 2016

By Janus Boye

I was recently asked to present at an internal seminar for senior management and representatives from communication and IT in a large and complex organisation. My presentation was focused on distilling what the best are doing to create outstanding digital solutions.

During the presentation I shared examples from Boye & Co members and others. Some of the examples I highlighted are award-winning case studies, while others are inspired by organisations and key individuals I have met during the year. In other words: The term best is used here based on my subjective view.

It has already been 2 busy weeks since the presentation and I’ve had more time to reflect on the many things going on at the moment in the digital transformation space. Here’s my updated list.

1) The best are where the users are

1.png

The role of the website has changed over the past years. While it used to be the center of the digital universe for most organisations, it is now more like an important planet in the solar system. Today at many organisations, sites like Facebook or Youtube compete for the role of the sun.

Depending on who your customers are, it might make more sense to invest heavily in Facebook, than to create a fancy website.

Wired did the thing analysts and press like to do from the time to time by declaring something dead. This time it was the Web which in their view was dead back in 2010. This year, they changed their mind in a story with a less catchy title: Wait! The Web Isn’t Dead After All. Google Made Sure Of It. Their main point was that Google, with their mobile version of Chrome, has kept the Web alive.

I do agree that mobile solutions are an important part of the equation when it comes to being where the users are. This goes externally where many succesful companies rely on an app experience and have websites that are little more than a business card.

Mobile obviously also makes sense internally, where mobile solutions are paving the way to create solutions for internal users who don’t sit at a desktop all day long.

The example from the left is from German industrial giant Siemens, who have rolled out the SiemensWorld app to employees world-wide alongside many other specific apps, e.g. for events and for training.

2) The best speak the language of their customers

Do you speak my language? When meeting with a large international hotel chain earlier this year, we discussed how much money it costs to create translated versions of the booking form in each and every language and how they compete with booking sites likes hotels.com who can invest heavily in localised interfaces. It does make a real difference in terms of conversions if the content is in my language or not.

A good example of good customer service in local language and dialect is Nacka Kommun, a municipality just outside the Swedish capital of Stockholm. As shown below they offer content in several dialects and languages and are currently looking for volunteers to help them with Jiddish.

Directly translated from Swedish, the headline on this page from the municipality of Nacka reads Minority languages and offers links to content in several dialects and languages

Directly translated from Swedish, the headline on this page from the municipality of Nacka reads Minority languages and offers links to content in several dialects and languages

I was on the jury for the EPiServer Awards, where Nacka Kommun won Best Nordic Website in the service and support category. Besides offering content in multiple languages, they’ve done a great job enabling citizens to find the information they are looking for.

Another point on speaking the language of their customers, is inspired by my meetings throughout the year with VICE media who are behind the famous vice.com news site. Quite an impressive and different media website geared towards the attractive 15 – 25 age group  

A screenshot of the Canadian version of vice.com

A screenshot of the Canadian version of vice.com

A quick look at the site and you’ll find that this is not your parents media firm. Different stories, different angles and they take on serious topics (e.g. international conflicts and politics) as well as less suitable for work topics. 

One of my take aways from the success of vice.com is also that while conventional wisdom says that the young target audience don’t want to read long texts, vice.com proves conventional wisdom wrong. The stories simply need to be well written and in the language of the customers.  

3) The best think cloud-first

Cloud is not a new thing. Many organisations are already using cloud services for big parts of their digital infrastructure. Salesforce.com has been around in the CRM space for over 15 years and I can think of very few who have their own on-premise email newsletter tool or analytics tool.

When Scott Brinker presented the Marketing Technology Landscape Supergraphic 2016 at a Boye CMS Expert Group meeting in Boston in September it was clear that almost all software categories on the map are now cloud based.

From a customer point of view, I noticed a shift this summer where many of the Boye members suddenly made cloud a requirement when procuring a new digital platform. To customers it makes a great deal of sense to remove deployments, upgrades and server maintenance from the equation.

Besides Salesforce.com, big vendors like Amazon and Microsoft are now offering cloud infrastructure used by companies around the world. Cloud-based packages like Office 365 from Microsoft and Google Apps also plays a role here as it has made cloud services accepted inside the enterprise, even in countries like Germany and Switzerland with data protection regulation.

At recent Boye peer group meetings in Europe, we’ve seen how vendors like Cloud CMSContentfulCrownpeak and Umbraco have come a long way to offer cloud services for content management, while other vendors still have a long way to go.

Thinking cloud-first means that as a customer you first explore, whether a cloud-based service can meet your requirements. Only if that is not the case, then you consider on-premise solutions.

4) The best have an agile mindset

It’s been several years since agile left the world of programmers and became a methodology with a broader appeal. There’s an agile marketing manifesto from 2012 and a popular article from the Content Marketing Institute in June 2016 laid out how marketers can work smarter with agile methods. The Lean Startup movement also continues to play a big role shortening product development cycles.

The usage of agile is very mixed across the board and somehow it seems like agile has received a bad reputation in many organisations, regardless of how much they follow agile best practices.

In some organisations you are best adviced not to use the term agile as it carries too much baggage

In some organisations you are best adviced not to use the term agile as it carries too much baggage

When I look at those organisations who really manage to get things done when it comes to digital and look across sectors, countries and size, they all have an agile mindset in common. Agile is far superior to the waterfall methodology as it both enables scaling and catering to changing requirements.

For more on this topic, I’ve published How to become an agile business.

5) The best uses video

There might have already been several “Year of the Video” markings in the past 10 years, but it remains an area where many organisations are still only getting started. The equipment and production costs have gone way down, but as with any content, creating good video material takes time and hard work.

Patrick Lithander who is Director Business Development at German-based content marketing agency fischerAppelt brought this amazing Youtube video on snowboarding with the NYPD to a Boye group meeting in Nuremberg:

With 15 million views and a relatively brief production time, it is one of many examples of what you can do with video that you cannot do with text-only. On the impact you can have when you leave the old-fashioned world of boring corporate videos. One of Patrick’s main points was that the time is now to invest in video and also brought use cases on how to videos and microlearning.

In Denmark organisations like Carlsberg and Jyske Bank have both invested in video for internal and external communication for several years, and led the way in demonstrating the impact of video.

6) The best work strategically with experience design

I’m a big believer in the importance of design,so I laughed when digital expert Matthias Henrici from Safari Consulting in a group meeting at Munich Airport made the convincing case for not relaunching the notorious and cult-like Lingscars site. Do visit the site if you haven’t already. This site is like an example of all the anti-web-usability best practices being used at the same time. Yet, most in the room were unwilling to bet their annual salary on a redesign having a positive impact on sales.

On a serious note, Matthias had many good points on how a relaunch and redesign can go horribly wrong. He convincingly made the case for step-by-step improvements, testing along the way and importantly using data to inform design decisions.

Lou Rosenfeld who is famous as co-author of the Polar Bear Book on information architecture made a similar point back in 2009 in a keynote at the Boye Philadelphia conference title Marrying Web Analytics and User Experience. The presentation slides has since received over 60,000 views.

Personalisation is also a topic that has been discussed for many years, but only now beginning to see strong case studies. For those concerned with the new EU Privacy Directory, the Danish Red Cross offers a good example of personalisation without logging in by looking up my location:

Notice how the website wants to know my location to show me where I can find a Red Cross shop near my location

Notice how the website wants to know my location to show me where I can find a Red Cross shop near my location

Thanks to Mikkel Højbjerg at City of Aarhus for sharing this practical example of experience design.

Design has so many aspects and the to do list is long to get it right. Without going too much in detail, I’ll just add two facets that deserve more attention among most:

  • Performance: A slow site has a very negative impact on my experience

  • Search engine optimisation: How you look on Google cannot be underestimated

Finally, this is where the cover photo to this posting comes in. On the photo from the Boye Aarhus 16 conference is Perttu Tolvanen, a digital leader from Finland, who makes an important point on touch points and requirements. His full slide deck on deciding your digital touch points can be accessed by clicking on the slide below:

perttu-tolvanen-final-advice-experience-design.png

7) The best have a good navigational concept

During the past 15 years, menus and navigation have been a plague to many projects. Information architects have come and gone to try to address this, but the problem remains that navigation is fundamentally broken on too many websites and intranets. Search is also an important part of navigation, but I won’t go deeper into that in this post.

Swiss-based Roche is one of the Boye members, that I tend to highlight as someone who has a good navigational concept. See roche.com and have a look for yourself. If you visit on a mobile device, you will probably find it somewhat familiar to many other mobile-friendly corporate websites, but the real difference is visible if you visit from a desktop as shown on the screenshot below.

I tend to also highlight how they use the navigation to guide you towards the content you might be looking for. Notice how it says Highlights in their navigation. Notice also that the navigation overlays the entire website. You either navigate or use the website. Somewhat similar to Netflix. You either navigate or you watch a film.

A final anecdote on navigation and the Roche example. A day after I saw their great work at Roche, I shared it on the Boye group on LinkedIn as a best practice example. In less than 3 hours, my post received several comments from other members, more or less saying that Roche did many things wrong. I guess this goes to prove that the topic of navigation can be an emotional one and that the experts are not in agreement.

8) The best uses standard tools and develops innovative solutions

When I worked at a software vendor back in 1999 – 2002, the build vs buy discussion was not unusual. Should I buy this piece of software to power my website or should I rather build something myself? Many used homegrown solutions for all kinds of things, incl. newsletter solutions, analytics and content management.

Today, the best deploy standard solutions whenever possible and then write custom code to create innovative solutions.

To deploy standard solutions, I notice that some of the best organisations are working closely with smart agencies while others are relying on their own in-house developers. That’s fine, but when I look at those who are creating innovative, game-changing solutions, I see a clear pattern that the best have their own developers. That doesn’t mean that they don’t work with vendors and agencies, but the best have in-house skills and talent to move them ahead. 

9) The best are shaping the workplace of the future

I was very impressed during my visits to the new headquarters of Tesa and Philips both in Hamburg, Germany. Both were kind to host Boye group meetings earlier this year and while Tesa has their global headquarter in Hamburg, for Philips it is their regional headquarter for Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Both organisations are large, complex and global old-economy firms, and both had put considerable thinking into changing how a workplace looks like in 2016 and beyond.

At Tesa we saw impressive display screens that offered employees the opportunity for interaction via touch. Display screens have such tremendous potential beyond showing the menu in the canteen and Tesa had taken it quite far, including for guiding employees around campus, showing relevant news and corporate history.

When at Philips, we were lucky to get a guided tour around their offices. I’ve seen similar setups at start-ups, but not at large, old-economy firms. Here’s a photo from inside Philips:

9.jpg

And this unusually charming corporate meeting space was available when we passed it

10.jpg

Some final words on workplace of the future. As Hanns Köhler-Krüner, Managing Vice President at Gartner, said in another Boye group meeting in Cologne:

It’s not about culture change, but habit change

He made several very good points on how to measure the success of the workplace of the future and made it quite clear that the digital workplace (or intranet if you prefer that term) was a part of it, but as the examples from Philips and Tesa show, there are much more to it.

10) The best keep learning

It might go without saying for you having read so far, but with the rapid speed of change, we need to have a hunger for learning, both as individuals and as organisations.

How do we set aside the time on a regular basis to look beyond the day-to-day meetings and over-crowded email inbox?

There are several good approaches to this. I’ve learned tremendously from travelling, from visiting other firms and talking to peers. I would like to read more books and watch some more TED talks. Others will have different approaches that work well for them.

Learning can be institutionalised and learning can and also be fun. When it comes to digital, learning can also be tough, painful and stressful. There are many learnings from having problems with a website that is down, from having prematurely published the confidential press release and these things to happen.

To quote American blues singer BB King (1925- 2015):

The beautiful thing about learning is nobody can take it away from you

What did I miss? Anything you disagree with? Please do feel free to leave a comment below

The Declaration of Digital Transformation Success

How do you achieve digital transformation success? Some might answer that it varies, since no two success stories are quite the same. Failed projects, however, seem to posses all too many commonalities, which actually implies that we should be able to arrive at some principles for success as well. Or at the very least for avoiding complete failure. Right?

Read more

The rise and upcoming fall of customer experience

Recent years have seen a lot of hype surrounding customer experience, but without anchoring the concept within a deeper digital transformation, it’s just another overhyped buzzword.

I am always interested in looking beyond the hype and trying to understand what is really happening, which is why I seeked out Michael Bednar-Brandt who is Director Digital EMEA at Oracle.

Read more

Two steps in delivering value to your customers

Many CEOs are looking to turn their organisation into a customer-focused one, but let’s take a step back and look at what that actually entails.

Does every CEO perceive customer experience activities the same way? Is the CEO familiar with all the possibilities we have to choose from when trying to become a customer-focused organisation? These are difficult questions.

Read more

The usual disconnect between strategy and execution

Strategies never succeed on software alone. On the contrary, most of the actions involved in implementing a new strategy has to be performed by people. Still, formulating and ensuring deadlines are met might be aided by visual management tools as well as simple, well worked routines that focuses on honest assessment of every employee’s ability to execute tasks.

Read more

Banking has changed. Soon it will change much more

A recent study by Viacom Media Networks shows 71% of Millennials said they’d rather visit the dentist than hear what a bank has to say.

If you couple this with the fact that transactions performed at physical bank branches are on the down, and in many countries bank branches are closing, it is clear that what we know as banking is in for a wild ride over the coming years.

Read more

Needs versus requirements

Much has been written about why projects, and in particular digital projects, don’t succeed. Be it lack of executive sponsorship, poorly documented requirements, technology problems, simply lack of follow-up and the list goes on.

At a recent Boye group meeting in Munich, Claudia Urschbach from Süddeutsche Zeitung took a different approach by looking behind stakeholders and their requirements and trying to get to a deeper understanding of their needs and anxieties. Might our lack of appreciation for these basic human emotions be exactly why projects gets stalled and too often fail?

Understanding needs

In most projects that I’ve been involved in there has been a reasonable understanding of key requirements. Some also have a carefully developed requirements specification detailing functional, design and technical aspects of the project. But what about the needs of the executive sponsor, the needs of the project manager, the needs of the designer and everyone else involved?

Claudia has worked with user experience since 1999, incl. a few years at the BBC in London before moving to Munich and joining Süddeutsche. In her workshop at the group meeting, Claudia referenced American psychologist David McClelland and his work on motivation need theory. As shown on the illustration, the driving factors of human actions are below the water.

1*u8Jm5CjOQVTEklfqOEDWiA.jpg

Some usual needs involved in projects, incl. the need for being heard, the need to get a promotion, the need to be seen as competent. If your projects fail to address those, why should your stakeholder invest time and resources in the project?

As the famous management quote goes from Harvard Business School marketing professor Theodore Levitt:

“People don’t want to buy a quarter-inch drill. They want a quarter-inch hole!

To paraphrase Claudia, my take away from the workshop, was that most probably don’t want a drill nor a hole, but instead we have to think deeper to ensure that our digital initiatives stay on track.

Understanding fears and anxieties

Taking a step deeper from the needs are the fears and anxieties. What might go wrong in a project? Could I get fired? Might the project make me look silly or even incompetent? Might I miss my annual bonus?

In my experience, these fears are rarely made explicit during a project. Instead they reveal themselves indirectly, when people delay projects, make it difficult to move forward and in more or less subtle ways try to distance themselves from a project.

Making it work in your organisation

The advice from Claudia was not necessarily to spend much time with the entire project team on what you might consider pop psychology, but rather use your deeper understanding of needs and fears, to have 1:1 conversations at the onset of the project to help drive the project forward.

According to Claudia, it is worth for a project manager to systematically think through each stakeholder group’s perspectives on the project focusing beyond their requirements on their needs and fears. This process should be part of a project managers risk assessment of a project and ideally is repeated and reviewed throughout the project.


5 things that will sink LinkedIn’s empire

By Janus Boye

Will LinkedIn last? A reasonable question given the remarkable and monopoly-like position LinkedIn has achieved as a professional network during the past decade.

The announcement that LinkedIn is being acquired by Microsoft came on June 13 and has so far had little impact for the many using LinkedIn to showcase their work. According to their own numbers, LinkedIn has over 400 million users and more than 100 million active users per month.

Clearly LinkedIn will not disappear anytime soon, but people such as Silicon Valley pioneer Andreas Ramos say LinkedIn is about to lose its place at the centre of the social Web for business purposes.

I had a recent conversation with him trying to understand better why he considers LinkedIn a dinosaur. Or as he says in standard Valley jargon:

There is a great opportunity to build a better LinkedIn”

1. The customers are recruiters, not users

LinkedIn started as a social networking site where people posted their professional profiles so they could connect to each other. But people weren’t willing to pay to build social networks. However, recruiters are willing to pay thousands of dollars per month for access to the resume database. So LinkedIn turned into a service for recruiters to find workers.

This means LinkedIn’s customers are recruiters, not users, so LinkedIn pays attention to the recruiters. And ignores the users.

That’s why many of LinkedIn’s user tools, such as profiles, messaging, portfolio, and so on are nearly useless or look like something from fifteen years ago. It’s very easy to spam users, so many requests for contacts are ignored. There is a way to post articles, but it’s convoluted and few use it. There is no way to send an email newsletter to one’s connections. The messaging tool is outdated. The app is nearly useless. Although LinkedIn did an IPO and raised $350 million, they spent very little of it on improving the user experience or interface, because users don’t produce revenue. In contrast, recruiters, who pay around US $1,000 per month per seat, have powerful tools to filter and sort resumes.

So LinkedIn is a resume database. Which means if you have a secure job, there’s little reason to visit LinkedIn. LinkedIn is not a Facebook for professionals, but a site for recruiters.

2. LinkedIn isn’t the place to find the best jobs

When sociologists studied social networks, they learned that a few people have weak or poor connections and most people have okay connections. However, a few have thousand of connections and those connections are to the best people. Those top connections are also the people in charge of companies, projects, and budgets. They are the ones who hire.

Which means top people don’t need LinkedIn. They already have extensive personal networks. And the ones who hire also don’t use LinkedIn to hire; they ask their friends quietly for recommendations. The top people share their resources.

The bias towards recruiters affects how people are using Linkedin. Users see it as a resume site, not a professional networking site. Since the goal is to get a job, it’s easy to buy fake recommendations or create bloated or too-good-to-be-true profiles.

The solution lies outside of LinkedIn, and is quite simple, which I will expand on shortly.

3. LinkedIn are ignorant of the member experience

For a company with almost 10,000 employees, you would assume there would be a sizable team focusing fully on delivering an outstanding customer experience to members.

If such a team actually exits, their progress is weak to say the least. As already mentioned, there are simply so many examples of the member experience failing. To name a few:

  • The mobile app still leaves great room for improvement

  • Groups and community management is far behind anything you would expect in 2016

  • Emails when someone updated their profile. Sure, you will receive emails to make you pay for what used to be free. But useful email notifications, such as a new posting in your group or an important job change: forget about it.

  • Do you enjoy your activity stream solely containing postings about Pokemon Go? Or Chuck Norris jokes. No? Well, who cares? Linkedin definitely doesn’t.

  • Did you like a recent update a friend wrote and want to link to it? Facebook has had the feature for years, but for Linkedin such a feature is rocket science.

4. LinkedIn doesn’t care about your career

You would think that a site built around finding jobs would have helpful career advice, but there is very little career advice or help at LinkedIn. What they offer is generally useless or bad advice, such as telling you how to appear like someone the recruiters want, instead of actually becoming better at your job, how to expand your career, or other fields and opportunities.

LinkedIn could hire the very best career coaches to offer free books and videos on how to create and manage your career to your benefit. It could be argued that LinkedIn and recruiters don’t want you to improve your career because when you move up, you move out of LinkedIn’s and the recruiters’ range. But LinkedIn is already making enough money so they don’t care about this.

If you’re looking for a job or want to improve your career, my advice is to put LinkedIn lower on your list of tasks. Reach out to people who are at the top or ten years ahead of your career. Send them an email, call them, or even better, meet them for lunch or coffee. Join professional organizations and volunteer to help in the organization. Build your network. Take classes, read books, and improve your skills. It’s the oldest advice in networking handbooks and with good reason: that’s how the world works. The few at the top have all the connections: get to know them.

5. LinkedIn provides recruiters with well-educated white people

If the people at the top aren’t on LinkedIn, what about everyone else? The people who use LinkedIn are mostly white-collar mid-level corporate staff. They are generally in companies that use computer technology. Workers at small companies in traditional fields rarely show up.

This means people at the bottom aren’t on LinkedIn. They work in jobs that don’t use computers. These jobs are low-pay so the recruiters have little interest because the recruiter fees are small. McDonald’s isn’t going to hire expensive recruiters to fill temporary jobs, nor will they use LinkedIn’s recruiter tools for this.

To quote Andreas:

“I’d hate to see how low the numbers are for black women. LinkedIn has what recruiters want, or to put it the other way, it doesn’t have what recruiters don’t want. This means LinkedIn has a significant share of the blame for low diversity in the workplace.”

Thoughts on a better professional network

There’s a strong need to build a jobs and careers network platform that reflects the world we live in.

People would be able to improve their skills and move up in their career. By building strong relationships, they would have better job security, either by being in better jobs or able to find new jobs when a company shuts down.

A new platform could also make money from recruiters, but a new platform will hopefully focus on a superior member experience.

More about the problems at LinkedIn

Thanks to Niels Rysz from the communications department at higher education institution UC SYD in Denmark who shared several good examples of horrible customer service at LinkedIn in his posting in Danish: LinkedIn kolos på lerfødder.

Patrick Moore wrote a good analysis titled LinkedIn has lost its vision. Why don’t people update their LinkedIn profile? Patrick offers the following reasons:

  • “I am not looking for a new job”

  • “I am looking for a new job, but I don’t want my manager to know I am looking.”

  • “I just got a new job, and I don’t know if it is going to work out so I am not putting it my profile until I know that it will.”